It is difficult for me to answer that, because I am a member of the ELMS pilot scheme, so I am deeply involved in the formation of ELMS. What I would say is that public money for public goods is the right way forward, with carbon captured in the soil and a corresponding payment made to farmers so that we can balance up the subsidy deficit that British farmers will face compared with their European competitors. At the end of the day I do not believe in subsidy for anything other than agriculture, and we subsidise only in order that our goods are competitive globally—if do not pay our farmers enough, our produce will not compete internationally and our farmers will be at a huge disadvantage.
Animal Welfare (Sentience) Bill [Lords]
Proceeding contribution from
Bill Wiggin
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 18 January 2022.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Animal Welfare (Sentience) Bill [Lords].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
707 c277 
Session
2021-22
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-05-03 15:04:37 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2022-01-18/22011867000087
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2022-01-18/22011867000087
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2022-01-18/22011867000087