The Minister rightly refers to Sir Richard Henriques’ report. Sir Richard is someone for whom I have great regard. My hon. Friend will also know that, prior to that, there was a report by His Honour Judge Shaun Lyons, who had served as an officer and as a senior circuit judge. It was Judge Lyons’ recommendation to do away with concurrent jurisdiction that led to the amendment in the Lords. Why does the Minister feel that it would be appropriate to take on board the rest of the Lyons report recommendations but to leave out this particular one? That seems a little strange, given that it was accepted that, overall, the Lyons review was a very constructive piece of work.
Armed Forces Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Robert Neill
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 6 December 2021.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Armed Forces Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
705 c96 
Session
2021-22
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2021-12-07 10:14:55 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2021-12-06/21120650000037
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2021-12-06/21120650000037
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2021-12-06/21120650000037