That is exactly right. It is for that reason that if there were a Division I would not be voting for this legislation, because I do not think it comes with enough parliamentary scrutiny—the sort of scrutiny that there is if we use the Civil Contingencies Act 2004.
Coronavirus Act 2020 (Review of Temporary Provisions) (No. 3)
Proceeding contribution from
Mark Harper
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 19 October 2021.
It occurred during Debate on Coronavirus Act 2020 (Review of Temporary Provisions) (No. 3).
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
701 c659
Session
2021-22
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-09-20 09:49:05 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2021-10-19/21101950000686
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2021-10-19/21101950000686
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2021-10-19/21101950000686