UK Parliament / Open data

Trade Bill

Proceeding contribution from Greg Hands (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 22 March 2021. It occurred during Debate on bills on Trade Bill.

I am going to make more progress.

In any case, it is not necessary to set out such provision in legislation. In fact, I would be surprised if hon. Members voted today to bind themselves by setting out in legislation the procedures of a parliamentary Sub-Committee. Parliament is free to amend its Standing

Orders to set up Committees and Sub-Committees as it chooses, and to take evidence from those with legal expertise if it deems that to be necessary. Legislating for these matters would only serve to remove flexibility from both Parliament and Government should the issue of genocide as it pertains to trade arise in future. A more nimble and flexible approach may be necessary depending on the context.

The precise details remain to be worked out—by Parliament, quite properly—but I hope it will be clear from what I have said today that the Government are supportive of working with hon. Members on this issue, and we are committed to doing so in line with the process previously agreed to by this House on 9 February.

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
691 cc667-8 
Session
2019-21
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Legislation
Trade Bill 2019-21
Back to top