I agree with the right hon. Lady that the clause uses a dry way of saying something that I think is actually really important, which is that in all of this discussion we need to remember that prime ministerial patronage is limited by that Act for good reason. While that should not be the enemy of improvements for women who are going on maternity leave, I do think that it needs to be considered. If we think of recent Parliaments, in which majorities have been very small, it is quite an increase, percentage-wise, to the payroll if more people are added to it. I am grateful to the drafters of the Bill for having thought this through, and I hope that in any future work she does, that is seriously considered as part of the mix, so that the House at least debates any decision to change that.
Ministerial and other Maternal Allowances Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Meg Hillier
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Thursday, 11 February 2021.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Ministerial and other Maternal Allowances Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
689 c591 
Session
2019-21
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-30 20:17:49 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2021-02-11/21021133000068
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2021-02-11/21021133000068
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2021-02-11/21021133000068