I know that we will move on to the question of what is not in the Bill and what might be later, but before the Lord Chancellor leaves the issue of improving our access to international legal agreements, he has not yet mentioned our application to accede to the Lugano convention, which many regard as critical, it being markedly superior in a number of respects to those listed on the face of the Bill. There is a concern that the Commission is currently recommending against Britain joining the convention, even though the European Free Trade Association members of that convention support it. What is the position on that? Will he assure us that the Government regard this as one of the highest priorities in our ongoing negotiations? It should not be allowed to be hijacked and held as a hostage to fortune in other negotiations.
Private International Law (Implementation of Agreements) Bill [Lords]
Proceeding contribution from
Robert Neill
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 2 September 2020.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Private International Law (Implementation of Agreements) Bill [Lords].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
679 c217 
Session
2019-21
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-28 07:38:18 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2020-09-02/20090223000164
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2020-09-02/20090223000164
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2020-09-02/20090223000164