We have produced our response to the Committee’s report, and I commend it to him. He highlights the issue about an inquiry, which underlines the fact that it is the work of the intelligence and security agencies to assess any new evidence as it emerges. Given that long-standing approach, we do not believe that it is necessary to hold a specific retrospective inquiry. If evidence were available to be found, it would emerge through our existing processes. We have seen no evidence of successful interference in the way that has been described by some. Indeed, that leads many people to think that it is more about re-arguing some of the issues of the Brexit referendum, not respecting and reflecting the outcome of that referendum. We are working at pace on the legislation and I am sure that there will be plenty of opportunities in the House to debate that, as well as other issues related to the report.
Intelligence and Security Committee: Russia Report
Proceeding contribution from
James Brokenshire
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 22 July 2020.
It occurred during Urgent question on Intelligence and Security Committee: Russia Report.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
678 c2157 
Session
2019-21
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-28 05:46:23 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2020-07-22/20072223000186
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2020-07-22/20072223000186
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2020-07-22/20072223000186