Obviously we will work with the devolved Administrations on future funding. The Bill—in later clauses, so I will not dwell on it now—deals with recommendations for the allocation of funding this year, pertinent to the conclusions of the Bew review, which I will come on to. More generally, future policy envisages payment for public goods, but it also envisages a long transition towards that. We have given a commitment to keep the agriculture budget the same at least for this Parliament. [Interruption.] Within the UK, yes, there will be some discussions on allocation, but every component of the UK is likely to adopt a transition period during which they would want to keep, at least for a time, something akin to the current system as they move to a new one. That said, the funding settlement is for a future day and discussion, not for the Bill today, which covers this year only.
Direct Payments to Farmers (Legislative Continuity) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
George Eustice
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 28 January 2020.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Direct Payments to Farmers (Legislative Continuity) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
670 c679 
Session
2019-21
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-26 21:01:00 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2020-01-28/20012830000063
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2020-01-28/20012830000063
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2020-01-28/20012830000063