Viewing this situation objectively, I do not believe that there is any constitutional impropriety whatsoever in what the House is being asked to do this afternoon. It simply does not arise. The truth is that we have a flexible constitution. I rather agree with my right hon. Friend that one often wants more time, but it is precisely when one faces an emergency that the flexibility of the constitution becomes most desirable, and I cannot alter the fact that the emergency exists. With that in mind, I would hope that he would appreciate that there is nothing improper in what the House is doing. In fact, it is only since a recent date in this House�s history that we have been fettered by the Government�s almost total control of the Order Paper.
Business of the House
Proceeding contribution from
Dominic Grieve
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 3 April 2019.
It occurred during Debate on Business of the House.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
657 c1093 
Session
2017-19
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-06-29 12:36:43 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2019-04-03/19040331000050
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2019-04-03/19040331000050
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2019-04-03/19040331000050