As I will come on to say shortly, there have been some ups and downs with getting this Bill through. Back in October, on the civil partnerships clauses, the Prime Minister herself, in an article in the London Evening Standard, made it clear that Government policy was now firmly in favour of extending civil partnerships to opposite-sex couples. That was a clear undertaking, which was almost unanimously supported by Members of this House and very largely supported by Members of the other House. We have factored in the legislation in such a way that it can be brought in this year, which is really important and means it will also comply with the Supreme Court judgment. If there are people who have not entered into a civil partnership—presuming there are those who want it, and I know there are—before the end of this year, I shall be more than a little peeved, but I shall also be greatly surprised. That is not a problem I anticipate.
Civil Partnerships, Marriages and Deaths (Registration Etc.) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Tim Loughton
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Friday, 15 March 2019.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Civil Partnerships, Marriages and Deaths (Registration Etc.) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
656 c668 
Session
2017-19
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2019-03-27 16:09:25 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2019-03-15/19031521000056
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2019-03-15/19031521000056
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2019-03-15/19031521000056