Absolutely. One key thing that we saw repeatedly—this is an issue for the Bill, I think—was the fluctuating nature of some brain injuries. For instance, fatigue is a very common feature of many brain injuries. I do not mean just feeling tired because you are sitting at the back of a debate in the House of Commons and somebody is wittering on for far too long and you fall asleep, but real, genuine fatigue. I mean the kind of lassitude that leaves you unable to move from one side of the bed to the other. It is often misunderstood, because it might look like laziness to somebody with a judgmental eye. That lassitude can pass or go through phases and can sometimes be a bit difficult to explain or predict. I am therefore really keen that we ensure, in all the processes in the Bill, that anyone with an acquired brain injury is regularly and repeatedly reassessed so that they have an opportunity to escape. That is important.
Mental Capacity (Amendment) Bill [Lords]
Proceeding contribution from
Chris Bryant
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 12 February 2019.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Legislative Grand Committee proceedings (HC) on Mental Capacity (Amendment) Bill [Lords].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
654 c798 
Session
2017-19
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2021-07-30 16:47:36 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2019-02-12/19021246000237
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2019-02-12/19021246000237
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2019-02-12/19021246000237