The hon. Gentleman refers to things being virtuous. I am sure that he believes that new clause 1 is virtuous, in that it sets out an assessment of the effect of reducing the threshold for the additional rate to £80,000, which is the Labour party’s policy. If he wants the facts and the evidence, why does he not support new clause 1, which will enable us to get all the facts and the evidence? Then we can have another debate, in which we can talk about Plutarch and Cicero until the cows come home.
Finance (No. 3) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Peter Dowd
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 19 November 2018.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Finance (No. 3) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
649 c627 
Session
2017-19
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-08-07 14:38:23 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2018-11-19/18111949000003
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2018-11-19/18111949000003
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2018-11-19/18111949000003