The Lord Chancellor is being very helpful. I welcome what he says about periodical payment orders, because they are a significant transfer on to the insurance company away from the person who is awarded, in terms of both investment and the longevity risk. Will he make it clear—as the noble Lord Keen indicated in the other House—that when he sets the discount rate, having taken the advice of the panel as part of the Government action, he does so as Lord Chancellor in his own right, and not on behalf of the Government? That point was raised by a number of noble lords in the other House when it was said that this decision is taken not for Treasury or governmental reasons, but on the basis of that advice, by the Lord Chancellor in his capacity as Lord Chancellor, almost quasi-judicially.
Civil Liability Bill [Lords]
Proceeding contribution from
Robert Neill
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 4 September 2018.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Civil Liability Bill [Lords].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
646 c83 
Session
2017-19
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-06-21 11:35:42 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2018-09-04/18090444000147
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2018-09-04/18090444000147
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2018-09-04/18090444000147