The hon. Gentleman is making some really important points, and I do not necessarily disagree with him, but, on the ethics, he says it is not necessarily in the child’s interests. The thought behind the argument is that the child would not be there in the first place—would not have gone through the people smugglers and so on—if that right did not exist. I repeat: the argument is not that people will use children as anchors to cynically get something they should not get; it is that these people, desperate and destitute and with limited funds to give to people smugglers, will be tempted to pay to get just one person, particularly a smaller person, transported. It is not that they are bad people or doing anything unethical; it is that they are desperate people.
Refugee Family Reunion
Proceeding contribution from
Neil O'Brien
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Thursday, 21 June 2018.
It occurred during Backbench debate on Refugee Family Reunion.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
643 c540 
Session
2017-19
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-06-26 15:05:08 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2018-06-21/18062132000084
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2018-06-21/18062132000084
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2018-06-21/18062132000084