I very much support this measure; it is absolutely right to compete for workers in the 21st century. However, terms in the guidance notes such as “back-filling” are troublesome. I am sure that my right hon. Friend would agree that it is necessary to maintain whole-time equivalents in our armed forces rather than relying constantly on back-filling. My 35 years’ experience in the regulars and the reserves tells me that back-filling usually means colleagues filling in for others. Does he agree that that is guaranteed to demoralise people and cause the retention problems to which he has referred?
Armed Forces (Flexible Working) Bill [Lords]
Proceeding contribution from
Andrew Murrison
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 30 October 2017.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Armed Forces (Flexible Working) Bill [Lords].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
630 c626 
Session
2017-19
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2017-10-31 11:47:05 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2017-10-30/17103013000057
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2017-10-30/17103013000057
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2017-10-30/17103013000057