My hon. Friend raises a good point about staff. The problem we have had in all Departments during the years of austerity is that the easy target is to get rid of so-called civil servant pen pushers. The actual effect of that is starkly focused in the case of HMRC, because when we start to get rid of staff whose job is to collect tax, not only do we lose those individuals’ expertise and their years of experience, but it costs the taxpayer, in that staff are no longer available to enforce the tax regulations. I have highlighted the issue of landfill tax fraud, for example. Does my hon. Friend agree that the Government should look at this as a case of “invest to save”? In other words, if they invested in civil servants to do something, the Government would be able to prove that they were getting more in revenue than it was costing to employ those civil servants.
Ways and Means
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Beamish
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 6 September 2017.
It occurred during Debate on Ways and Means.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
628 c230 
Session
2017-19
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-08-29 17:11:44 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2017-09-06/17090641000160
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2017-09-06/17090641000160
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2017-09-06/17090641000160