That is also true, and it is certainly true that we cannot be premature about imagining, or speculating about, the outcome of that process; but I think we can offer some certainty about our determination to consult on the arrangements in respect of this particular set of regulations—partly, of course, because they exist irrespective of the European Union. ATOL’s coincidental genesis with our entry to the European Union is just that, a coincidence. ATOL, I guess, would have existed regardless of our relationship with the European Union. Indeed, the regulatory and legislative framework that underpins it is domestic. So the domestic legislation that gave life to ATOL, and continues to do so, was very much at the behest of this Parliament, and of successive Governments—of all parties, by the way—who have continued to support that scheme.
Air Travel Organisers’ Licensing Bill
Proceeding contribution from
John Hayes
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 11 July 2017.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Air Travel Organisers’ Licensing Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
627 c229 
Session
2017-19
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2017-08-22 19:18:48 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2017-07-11/17071145000062
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2017-07-11/17071145000062
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2017-07-11/17071145000062