I am not sure that I can add anything to what I said a moment ago. Barnett consequentials are way above my pay grade, and I will have to do some checking before commenting one way or the other. It sounds as though making a presumption would be a very foolish error, and that is clearly not within the remit of these amendments.
High Speed Rail (London - West Midlands) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Andrew Jones
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 20 February 2017.
It occurred during Debate on bills on High Speed Rail (London - West Midlands) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
621 c835
Session
2016-17
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-13 19:06:26 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2017-02-20/17022028000096
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2017-02-20/17022028000096
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2017-02-20/17022028000096