I understand the point the hon. Gentleman and the hon. Member for The Cotswolds (Geoffrey Clifton-Brown) are making, but are they talking about a one-way ratchet? If the “different purpose” helpfully referred to in the Member’s explanatory note to amendment 27 meant that the land was worth less than the original purpose, would the landowner get a lower compensation, or is it a one-way ratchet?
Neighbourhood Planning Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Rob Marris
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 13 December 2016.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Legislative Grand Committee proceedings (HC) on Neighbourhood Planning Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
618 c677
Session
2016-17
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2017-02-10 15:26:39 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-12-13/16121349000043
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-12-13/16121349000043
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-12-13/16121349000043