UK Parliament / Open data

Neighbourhood Planning Bill

Proceeding contribution from Sajid Javid (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 10 October 2016. It occurred during Debate on bills on Neighbourhood Planning Bill.

As my hon. Friend has rightly identified, measures on the Land Registry are not part of the Bill, and the decision on privatisation will be for the Government to make in the future; it will not form part of this Bill, nor will it be introduced into the Bill in any shape or form at a later date.

Part 2 concerns compulsory purchase. In an ideal world, such a process would not exist. I would always prefer to see agreement secured through negotiation. However, as a last resort, we all know that it is sometimes necessary, and when that is the case, it is right that the process operates clearly, quickly and, above all, fairly. That does not always happen. Part of the problem is that the process is governed by a complex patchwork of statute and case law that has built up over many years. This slows the process down, increases costs, and bewilders individuals who are caught up in it. Ultimately, it benefits nobody—with the possible exception of lawyers. Clauses 9 to 30 will tackle these issues, making the system more effective, more transparent, cheaper and easier to navigate. Untying the tangle of red tape will speed up the process.

Once again, this will mean more homes—and the infrastructure that is required to support them—getting built more quickly.

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
615 cc81-2 
Session
2016-17
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Back to top