UK Parliament / Open data

Report of the Iraq Inquiry

Proceeding contribution from Emily Thornberry (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 13 July 2016. It occurred during Debate on Report of the Iraq Inquiry.

I am grateful to the right hon. Gentleman for that, because it is important to emphasise that there further lessons need to be learned, some of which I hope to address. I will not spend time repeating any of Chilcot’s factual findings, because, looking to the future, we need to consider the lessons and make sure that we do not make any of the same mistakes again. The Secretary of State for Defence will speak later about operational lessons that the military must learn, and it seems to me that there are more lessons than the five that Ministers have outlined so far.

I want to outline some of the points that jump out at us from the report. It seems to me that we have continued to make mistakes during the current Prime Minister’s time in office, and I will explain why.

On the flawed intelligence, although Chilcot finds that no deliberate attempt was made to mislead people, the intelligence on which the war was based was clearly flawed and did not justify the certainty attached to it by the Government. Has that lesson been learned? Last year, the Government asked this House to authorise military action in Syria. In contrast to Iraq in 2003, the military action did not include the deployment of ground troops.

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
613 c327 
Session
2016-17
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Back to top