I thank the Minister for being so accommodating in giving way. Looking at part 10 of the Bill and given the pressure the Prime Minister has been under this week, with the Panama papers and the statement today, I wonder why the Bill does not include a measure to allow HMRC to name and shame publicly those who are involved in tax avoidance not after the third warning but after the first warning, and so send a much clearer signal?
Finance (No. 2) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Greg Mulholland
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 11 April 2016.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Finance (No. 2) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
608 c101
Session
2015-16
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2017-09-20 13:13:56 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-04-11/16041114000042
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-04-11/16041114000042
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-04-11/16041114000042