UK Parliament / Open data

Investigatory Powers Bill

Proceeding contribution from Tom Tugendhat (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 15 March 2016. It occurred during Debate on bills on Investigatory Powers Bill.

Does my right hon. Friend agree that the definition of “urgent” needs to be one for a Minister, not a judge, and that therefore there should be no possibility of later applications for judicial review of what is urgent?

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
607 c859 
Session
2015-16
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Back to top