Indeed. To respond to the earlier point, we were being asked to leave open the opportunity of military action being taken in the future. That is what the debate and the vote were about; it was not a vote about whether we should take military action at that point. It would have left open that opportunity, but because the vote went against leaving open that opportunity, the chance to take military action in Syria was closed down at that point. I agree entirely with the hon. Member for North East Fife (Stephen Gethins) that the whole purpose of this debate is to highlight the importance of funding the Foreign and Commonwealth Office adequately.
The FCO and the Spending Review 2015
Proceeding contribution from
Tom Brake
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 1 March 2016.
It occurred during Estimates day on The FCO and the Spending Review 2015.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
606 c860 
Session
2015-16
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-11 18:33:18 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-03-01/16030138000170
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-03-01/16030138000170
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-03-01/16030138000170