The hon. Lady has referred to the £1.1 billion, which brought the extension down from two years to 18 months and, we are told, dealt with 81% of the women affected. So only 20% roughly are left at 18 months and the cost would be up £200 million. Can we put it to Government that that £200 million would have bought the loyalty of the rest of us this evening, but it won’t if they don’t?
Transitional State Pension Arrangements for Women
Proceeding contribution from
Peter Bottomley
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 24 February 2016.
It occurred during Opposition day
and
e-petition debate on Transitional State Pension Arrangements for Women.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
606 c371 
Session
2015-16
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-04-17 02:30:43 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-02-24/16022459000009
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-02-24/16022459000009
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-02-24/16022459000009