Is not the crux of the issue that we see a clear a breach of contract? If this were a private pension company that unilaterally changed the pension conditions of 2.6 million ladies in this country, this House would quite rightly be up in arms. Those ladies want only to have that contract mitigated fairly. Surely the Government should listen to the 2.6 million ladies in this country, and act now.
Transitional State Pension Arrangements for Women
Proceeding contribution from
Richard Arkless
(Scottish National Party)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 24 February 2016.
It occurred during Opposition day
and
e-petition debate on Transitional State Pension Arrangements for Women.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
606 c342
Session
2015-16
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-04-17 02:30:37 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-02-24/16022449000510
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-02-24/16022449000510
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-02-24/16022449000510