UK Parliament / Open data

Education and Adoption Bill

Proceeding contribution from Nicholas Dakin (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 23 February 2016. It occurred during Debate on bills on Education and Adoption Bill.

There is absolutely no confusion. We are just arguing that, whatever title there is above the door to the school—academy, free school, maintained school, university technical college or whatever—the same rules should apply, and all those rules should recognise the importance and the role of parents.

Labour believes that all schools should be treated equally. There should not be preferential treatment of schools that are academies compared with maintained schools when either are failing or coasting. Academies that are failing should have no more rights than maintained schools that are failing. There should be a level playing field for children, parents and communities, whatever the structure of the school. Labour believes that a partnership with parents is key to a strong education system, which is why we continue to argue that when their child’s school is to academise or the academy’s sponsor is to be changed, parents should be consulted.

Lords amendment 1 agreed to.

Lords amendments 2 to 6 agreed to.

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
606 c266 
Session
2015-16
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Back to top