Does the hon. Gentleman accept that one piece of evidence about why the reverse burden of proof would have been an effective brake on the excesses of the banks is the fact that bankers themselves are not keen on it? They knew that it would be an effective tool and were fearful of it.
Bank of England and Financial Services Bill [Lords]
Proceeding contribution from
Sammy Wilson
(Democratic Unionist Party)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 1 February 2016.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Bank of England and Financial Services Bill [Lords].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
605 c671
Session
2015-16
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2020-04-15 15:19:45 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-02-01/16020121000034
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-02-01/16020121000034
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-02-01/16020121000034