My right hon. Friend has just stated that his package would “require changes” that are “legally binding and irreversible”. As there is no treaty change on offer, on what grounds can he legitimately and honestly contend that an international agreement registered at the UN would be legally binding and irreversible, and that voters—this is what matters—could absolutely rely on it when they cast their votes? Will this be a cast-iron guarantee?
EU Council
Proceeding contribution from
William Cash
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 5 January 2016.
It occurred during Ministerial statement on EU Council.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
604 c34 
Session
2015-16
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2019-12-18 12:33:03 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-01-05/16010514000240
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-01-05/16010514000240
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-01-05/16010514000240