If we talked to the public about the way our Parliament works and said that we have an elected House which, as a result of these proposals on secondary legislation, will have the final say, but that we also have a group of people who have been eminent in their very different professions—people ranging from Lord Lloyd-Webber in the arts to some of the most senior business people—whose job it is to advise and guide the elected House about when it might be getting it right and when it might be getting it wrong, I think they might form a different view. I accept that there are strong opinions about this, but right now this is about solving a structural problem in the relationship between the two Houses that has emerged in the past few months. Lord Strathclyde has given us three sensible options to work with.
Strathclyde Review
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Grayling
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Thursday, 17 December 2015.
It occurred during Ministerial statement on Strathclyde Review.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
603 c1749 
Session
2015-16
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2020-01-29 14:35:14 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-12-17/15121727000562
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-12-17/15121727000562
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-12-17/15121727000562