If we have a revising Chamber in the form that we have, it makes sense that it still has a role in secondary legislation, much of which is of a more technical nature. I therefore welcome the fact that option 3 has been chosen. Will the Leader of the House confirm that this will not stop the Government looking at options to deal with some of the things that make the other place almost a laughing stock, such as those who do not attend and others whose reason for being there has perhaps now disappeared?
Strathclyde Review
Proceeding contribution from
Kevin Foster
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Thursday, 17 December 2015.
It occurred during Ministerial statement on Strathclyde Review.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
603 c1749 
Session
2015-16
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2020-01-29 14:35:12 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-12-17/15121727000559
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-12-17/15121727000559
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-12-17/15121727000559