I will respond to my hon. Friend’s intervention in more detail later in my speech. Although I have some sympathy for that argument—the causes of riots can be extremely varied and in many cases they are not the direct result of police action or inaction—I think there are both principled and practical reasons to maintain the current principle of strict liability. One such practical reason is that, if someone is unable to afford insurance and has suffered losses during a riot, it is very unlikely that they would have the means to bring a court action to establish that the police had been negligent and thereby claim damages through the usual legal means.
Riot Compensation Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Mike Wood
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Friday, 4 December 2015.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Riot Compensation Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
603 c611 
Session
2015-16
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2021-11-04 13:30:49 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-12-04/15120444000094
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-12-04/15120444000094
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-12-04/15120444000094