The first point I have to make is that banks with the smallest profits do not pay the surcharge. There is a minimum level to protect the very smallest banks. The bank levy that was introduced early in the previous Parliament reflected some of the issues that existed at that time. It was designed in part to encourage a different type of behaviour that would reduce risks. Regulatory changes have rather addressed that particular point. The move to a surcharge—a higher level of corporation tax—is sensible and timely given some of the changes that have been made. It is not possible in those circumstances to carve out those institutions that we like and dislike beyond putting in that de minimis level. That was a sensible approach to take.
Finance Bill
Proceeding contribution from
David Gauke
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 21 July 2015.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Finance Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
598 c1390 
Session
2015-16
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2017-06-05 15:16:06 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-07-21/15072125000373
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-07-21/15072125000373
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-07-21/15072125000373