That is the question the Government need to answer. The phrase “based on the convention” is important. I do not say that every bit of the convention’s wording is absolutely perfect in modern terms, but I think most of us would say that we want the principles that underpin the convention to be incorporated in any proposals. For what it is worth, my early urging to the Government is that the closer they stick to the convention’s wording in anything incorporated into British law, the better, because that would give us great clarity and security. Then we must look at the point raised by my right hon. and learned Friend the Member for Beaconsfield and my hon. Friend the Member for Banbury (Victoria Prentis)about the unintended consequences that were not always seen through in the Act, to do with extraterritoriality and related matters. I hope we will get assurances from the Minister on that point.
Human Rights Act
Proceeding contribution from
Robert Neill
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 30 June 2015.
It occurred during Debate on Human Rights Act.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
597 c416WH 
Session
2015-16
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2020-02-11 16:30:46 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-06-30/15063035000069
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-06-30/15063035000069
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-06-30/15063035000069