My right hon. Friend is very kind and very generous; she knows me of old. Is it not interesting that one reason why the present Government decided not to go with the original Arup proposal and follow the route, which would have been much cheaper, of an existing transport corridor was that they wanted to go at ultra-high speed, and ultra-high speed trains need to travel in straight lines? However, because of the work of the Department for Transport and the ongoing work of the parliamentary Committee, which has caused a number of changes in the route, we now know that in fact the trains will not be able to go at ultra-high speed, because there are so many changes to the route. They could have followed an existing transport corridor, saving money and the environment.
High Speed 2
Proceeding contribution from
Michael Fabricant
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 25 March 2015.
It occurred during Adjournment debate on High Speed 2.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
594 c515WH 
Session
2014-15
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-08-30 17:52:46 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-03-25/15032590000041
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-03-25/15032590000041
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-03-25/15032590000041