UK Parliament / Open data

High Speed 2

Proceeding contribution from Cheryl Gillan (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 25 March 2015. It occurred during Adjournment debate on High Speed 2.

The economic case was dodgy in the first place and has been challenged by many economists and outside commentators. One of the basic problems was

that it was assumed that no one did any meaningful work on a train. That was extraordinary to me. The argument has been fraught with holes since the beginning. I think that even at the current estimate, the Treasury will not be impressed, and in the final analysis it will be the Treasury that holds the purse strings.

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
594 c513WH 
Session
2014-15
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Back to top