Further to that point of order, Mr Speaker. Thank you for your helpful reply to my inquiry on this matter. Is it not right that debates are, on most days, in the hands of the Government? They are perfectly capable of putting down clear motions that people will understand. If they want a vote on the arrest warrant, they can have one. Does this not seem to you, as it does to me, to be procedural prestidigitation to persuade people that they are voting on something on which they are not really voting? Would it not be better if the Government were to put down a clear motion on some future day that we could vote on properly?
Points of Order
Proceeding contribution from
Jacob Rees-Mogg
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 10 November 2014.
It occurred during Points of order on Points of Order.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
587 c1202 
Session
2014-15
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2015-05-22 15:29:58 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-11-10/14111013000129
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-11-10/14111013000129
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-11-10/14111013000129