David Higgins is apparently incapable of distinguishing between the land around the stations. The redevelopment at King’s Cross took place on useless, empty, brownfield railway land; the land on both sides of Euston station is not brownfield land to be rescued by some Australian missionary, but a place where people live, go about their business and send their children to school, and somewhere people go to old folks’ luncheon clubs. They want to continue to do that; they do not want the area levelled as part of some grandiose redevelopment scheme that everyone can think is wonderful. I speak as someone who has strongly supported redevelopment at Euston and was the first person to advocate using St Pancras station as the terminus for the channel tunnel link, so I do not need to take any lessons from anyone, but the same situation does not apply at Euston—
High Speed Rail (London – West Midlands) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Frank Dobson
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 9 September 2014.
It occurred during Debate on bills on High Speed Rail (London – West Midlands) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
585 c813 
Session
2014-15
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-01-22 18:37:50 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-09-09/14090953000166
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-09-09/14090953000166
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-09-09/14090953000166