The right hon. Lady’s point simply emphasises how the detail is important. With Euston, however, it is not a matter of detail. The current proposal that the House voted through has been abandoned. In fact, it was abandoned before the House voted it through. The situation is utterly crazy. The proposition included in the Bill was basically to build a rather elegant lean-to engine shed at the west side of the existing Euston station, so most of the concern and the emphasis and the source of petitions have been from people, homes and businesses to the west of the station. The proposition now is to abandon that and demolish the whole of the existing Euston station, which will clearly take longer and extend the impact. More time will be required because of the increase in scale and the impact on businesses and people living to the east of the station will massively increase.
High Speed Rail (London – West Midlands) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Frank Dobson
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 9 September 2014.
It occurred during Debate on bills on High Speed Rail (London – West Midlands) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
585 c810 
Session
2014-15
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-01-22 18:37:49 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-09-09/14090953000147
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-09-09/14090953000147
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-09-09/14090953000147