The hon. Lady makes a very good point. Indeed, there is already passive provision in the first phase to allow the Heathrow spur to be constructed, should it be decided to go forward in that way. From an engineering perspective, it would be very expensive and disruptive to try to join that link. Similarly, in relation to the passive provision for the HS1 link, it is ultimately for the Committee to decide whether or not a petition should be heard. The Committee may choose to hear petitions relating to a future link not being precluded, but the work of the Committee is about the railway before it and it cannot get bogged down considering the merits of links that may or may not happen.
High Speed Rail (London - West Midlands) Bill: Select Committee
Proceeding contribution from
Robert Goodwill
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 29 April 2014.
It occurred during Debate on bills on High Speed Rail (London - West Midlands) Bill: Select Committee.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
579 c716 
Session
2013-14
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-01-22 18:37:25 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-04-29/14042948000284
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-04-29/14042948000284
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-04-29/14042948000284