The point I was trying to make, perhaps at too great a length, was that the important thing was the headline rate when people were looking at places to locate their businesses. It is the same with income tax. While there may have been other tax changes that have affected the rich, when people make a judgment on the Government’s sincerity about austerity, they will look at the headline rate, and what they see when they look at the headline rate for those on middle incomes, for those on lower incomes—not in terms of the headline rate of income tax, but in terms of what has happened to their income—and for the most well-off in society is that there is a disparity, and that breeds cynicism. I believe an amendment such as this one will at least help to restore some confidence that when this House looks at what lies ahead, it is genuinely trying to make sure the burden is shared equally.
Finance (No.2) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Sammy Wilson
(Democratic Unionist Party)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 8 April 2014.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Finance (No.2) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
579 c189 
Session
2013-14
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2014-04-14 14:59:15 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-04-08/14040857000123
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-04-08/14040857000123
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-04-08/14040857000123