It is not just a question of sentencing; there is also the issue of what happens when someone who has caused serious injury, or death, to another person, continues to drive until his case is heard. If a car is indeed a lethal weapon, as others have suggested, why do courts not exercise their discretion to set bail conditions that make it impossible for people to drive when a test has established that their blood contained alcohol or drugs? That issue has been raised by other Members, including my hon. Friend the Member for Leeds North West (Greg Mulholland), who, like me, has a constituency interest. Jamie Still, the 16-year-old son of one of my constituents, was tragically killed on New Year’s Eve. The perpetrator drove for months until, finally, there was a conviction. Is that not wrong as well?
Dangerous Driving
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Herbert of South Downs
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 27 January 2014.
It occurred during Backbench debate on Dangerous Driving.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
574 c700 
Session
2013-14
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-08-31 09:35:22 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-01-27/14012726000392
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-01-27/14012726000392
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-01-27/14012726000392