We have tried to avoid complexity in the Bill because there is the prospect that it might be challenged. However, it will not be challenged on the grounds that it clears up a simple anomaly, which is what new clause 1 would do. I thoroughly support the new clause. Does the hon. Gentleman agree that it is odd that we have gone through extensive pre-legislative scrutiny, but the Government have ignored this central recommendation of the Culture, Media and Sport Committee?
Gambling (Licensing and Advertising) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Paul Farrelly
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 26 November 2013.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Gambling (Licensing and Advertising) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
571 c169 
Session
2013-14
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2020-04-16 09:36:50 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-11-26/13112638000247
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-11-26/13112638000247
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-11-26/13112638000247