UK Parliament / Open data

Psychoactive Substances

Proceeding contribution from Julian Huppert (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Monday, 11 November 2013. It occurred during Debate on Psychoactive Substances.

I suspect I will be one of the briefest speakers in this debate, not counting interventions. That will have to do as a working definition, and I have almost concluded.

Not only is it clear from the evidence that banning khat will be harmful and will not solve the problem, but it would also cost this country £12.8 million a year in the loss of the VAT that is currently being paid on the legal import of khat, with a total cost of £150 million, according to the Government’s own estimates. This is an example of a legal high that the Home Secretary is proposing to ban, and I intend to vote against that when we have the opportunity to do so, and it would be fantastic if the Labour party decided to join us. That example shows why this is such a hard issue.

I agree with the Minister that we should make it clear to the EU that we should make our own decisions, but it is also important that those decisions are the right ones.

11.42 pm

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
570 c772 
Session
2013-14
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Back to top