UK Parliament / Open data

European Public Prosecutor’s Office

If only that was the case. My wife questions the sanity of my move across to this place anyway. We were well rewarded for what we did; it paid exactly the same as for Members of Parliament

at the time, but Members of the European Parliament now have their own salary, and pay a different tax rate on most occasions.

OLAF came out of Wiseman’s report. It was mainly to investigate Commission fraud and crime, which was one of the things that brought down the European Commission in the first place. It also had plenty of powers to protect the EU’s financial interest. In the debate next week I intend to highlight what can be done in the reform of OLAF to allow us to prove to the European Commission that the whole new power grab of having a European public prosecutor’s office is not required. If the Commission used the powers and bodies it already has—already well funded and in general relatively well run—we would not be in this position in the first place. I wholeheartedly support the motion.

7.58 pm

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
569 cc272-3 
Session
2013-14
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Back to top