The hon. Lady is of course right. A greenhouse gas is a greenhouse gas and has an effect on climate change. I do not accept entirely the argument about some being natural and others are not. That is transparently the case, but it is not a distinction that should affect our consideration of emissions. Some processes and activities are more avoidable than others, and some have a societal interest. The hon. Lady’s contention is perfectly respectable and she is entirely consistent in what she says about not using pasture land to produce animals as we do at the moment. However, society generally does not agree with that view. Society in this country generally wants to eat meat and wants the most efficient and effective processes, which is why we provide research support to help the industry to make those processes as beneficial and as least harmful as possible, but that does not mean that people do not want to eat meat. In the same way, people want to move around the country despite the fact that doing has a demonstrable effect on greenhouse gas emissions.
Beef Cattle and Sheep (Carbon Footprint)
Proceeding contribution from
David Heath
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 26 June 2013.
It occurred during Adjournment debate on Beef Cattle and Sheep (Carbon Footprint).
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
565 c123WH 
Session
2013-14
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2019-07-29 16:03:47 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-06-26/13062660000145
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-06-26/13062660000145
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-06-26/13062660000145