We did indeed. We did not consider it during our pre-legislative scrutiny, because the issue is not covered by the Bill—there is some regret about that—but we did consider it in our governance report. We also published a separate report recommending the lifting of the cap on NEST and the removal of restrictions on transfers in and out of it. If the Government’s “pot follows member” proposal—which is in the Bill—is to work, the restriction on transfers must go, because otherwise anyone who has or is about to have savings in NEST will not be able to be followed by their pension pot when they move from one employer to another.
Pensions Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Anne Begg
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 17 June 2013.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Pensions Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
564 c670 
Session
2013-14
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-04-17 17:24:55 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-06-17/13061718000071
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-06-17/13061718000071
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-06-17/13061718000071