I do not wish to detain the House long but I am pleased that we have finally reached this point and that important details of Leveson are agreed. If I had been asked when I first looked at the Crime and Courts Bill which part I thought would keep us in ping-pong, it would not have been this provision or anything to do with blogs. I do not know whether the hon. Member for Bishop Auckland (Helen Goodman) was referring to me as a middle-aged man. I am the proud holder of a Liberal Democrat Voice “blogger of the year” award, but even I would have struggled desperately to write this provision or make all the definitions. I hope that the Secretary of State has been able to be clear. There will be people who try to game this, but that is true of all legislation. I hope that the Bill has been made as game-proof as possible, while preserving the pleasure of the games that people play on blogs. I am delighted that we are at this point and I will not take up any more of the House’s time. I look forward to the Bill being enacted and I hope that the Secretary of State will clarify those few remaining points.
Crime and Courts Bill [Lords]
Proceeding contribution from
Julian Huppert
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 22 April 2013.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Crime and Courts Bill [Lords].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
561 c691 
Session
2012-13
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2013-11-29 08:21:36 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-04-22/13042238000565
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-04-22/13042238000565
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-04-22/13042238000565