I am conscious that I shall not get the chance to intervene again. The Labour party’s position is clear: more needs to be done and if we are to do more in legislation, further consultation must be carried out and the issue must be looked at properly. That is why we support the amendment so that it can go back to the Lords and we can have a discussion about how to get more consultation and how agreement can be reached. We are clear that more needs to be done and I remind the hon. Gentleman that we touched on this issue in the Equality Act 2010, although we did not bring into force by order the inclusion of caste in the definition of race in that Act. However, the fact that we addressed the issue in that Act shows we were alive to it. As he and I know, practically implementing such measures in a way that does not lead to a plethora of litigation is something of which we must all be mindful.
Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Chuka Umunna
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 16 April 2013.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
561 c239 
Session
2012-13
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2017-03-22 11:29:23 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-04-16/13041638002294
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-04-16/13041638002294
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-04-16/13041638002294