I take my hon. Friend’s point about the boundaries that are being set. My point, however, is that there is a parallel between existing statute and what I believe is being proposed. I do not view statutory underpinning as somehow creating an entirely new set of constraints within which journalists will have to work. This is not, in my opinion, analogous to the difference between prescribed rights and general liberties that may be defined by their boundaries. My hon. Friend and I often agree about the distinction between different types of law and the tension that exists between them, but I do not believe that we will end up in that situation.
Leveson Inquiry
Proceeding contribution from
Robert Buckland
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 3 December 2012.
It occurred during Debate on Leveson Inquiry.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
554 c670 
Session
2012-13
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-11-26 10:38:16 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2012-12-03/12120339000048
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2012-12-03/12120339000048
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2012-12-03/12120339000048